spring boot
, , , ,

This is part 6 of the tutorial series for building a web application using Spring Boot. In this post we look at adding a DAO Authentication provider for Spring Security.

We started off with the first part by creating our Spring project using the Spring Initializr. In part 2, we rendered a web page using Thymeleaf and Spring MVC. This was followed by part 3 where we looked at setting up Spring Data JPA for database persistence. Part 4 was all about consolidating everything to provide a working Spring Boot MVC Web Application capable of performing CRUD operations.

In the previous part 5 of this series, we configured a basic in-memory authentication provider. It’s a good starting point to learn Spring Security, but as I mentioned there, it’s not for enterprise applications. A production-quality implementation would likely use the DAO authentication provider.

In this part of the series, I will discuss Spring Security with the DAO authentication provider to secure our Spring Boot Web application. We will implement both authentication and role-based authorization with credentials stored in the H2 database. For persistence, we will use the Spring Data JPA implementation of the repository pattern, that I covered in part 3. Although there are several Spring Data JPA implementations, Hibernate is by far the most popular.

As the Spring Data JPA dependency is included in our Maven POM, Hibernate gets pulled in and configured with sensible default properties via Spring Boot.

This post builds upon 5 previous posts. If you’re not familiar with all the content around Spring, I suggest you to go through this series from the start.

JPA Entities

Our application already has a Product JPA entity. We’ll add two more entities, User and Role. Following the SOLID design principle’sprogram to interface ” principle, we will start by writing an interface followed with an abstract class for our entities.

DomainObject.java

AbstractDomainClass.java

The entity classes are as follows.

User.java

Role.java

The User and Role JPA entities are part of the many-to-many relationship. Also, in Line 15 of the User class, notice that the password field is marked as @Transient.

That’s because we don’t want to store the password in text form.

Instead, we will store the encrypted form of the password.

JPA Repositories

Spring Data JPA provides the CRUD Repository feature. Using it, we just define the repository interfaces for our User and Role entities to extend CrudRepository.

The Spring Data JPA repositories for the User and Role entities are as follows.

UserRepository.java

RoleRepository.java

By extending CrudRepository, both the repositories inherit several methods for working with entity persistence, including methods for saving, deleting, and finding entities. Spring Data JPA uses generics and reflection to generate the concrete implementations of both the interfaces.

Spring Data JPA Services

We can now create the services, that will use Spring Data JPA to perform CRUD operations on the User and Role entities.

Of course, we will follow the Interface Segregation principle to maintain loose coupling. It’s always best to “program to interface”, especially when leveraging the benefits of Spring’s dependency injection.

So, let’s start with the service interfaces.

CRUDService.java

UserService.java

RoleService.java

Both RoleService and UserService extends CRUDService that defines the basic CRUD operations on entities. UserService, with the additional findByUsername() method is a more specialized service interface for CRUD operations on User.

We have made the service interfaces generic to mask our service implementations using the Façade design pattern. The implementations can be Spring Data JPA with repository, DAO, or Map patterns, or even plain JDBC, or some external Web service. The client code does not need not to be aware of the implementation. By using interfaces, we are able to leverage multiple concrete implementations of the services.

We’ll write the service implementation classes using the Spring Data JPA repository pattern.

UserServiceImpl.java

In this class, we auto-wired in UserRepository and EncryptionService. Going ahead, we will create EncryptionService using the Jasypt library to add encryption capabilities for storing user passwords. The overridden methods of this class use the UserRepository we created to perform CRUD operations on User.

The RoleServiceImpl provides a similar implementation for RoleService.

RoleServiceImpl.java

Free Spring TutorialPassword Encryption Service

The Jasypt library provides an implementation for unidirectional encryption. We will use Jasypt to encrypt a password before storing it to the database. For authentication, we will provide Jasypt the received password. Under the hood, Jasypt will encrypt the received password and compare it to the stored one.

Let’s add the Jasypt dependency to our Maven POM.

Note: The latest available Jasypt 1.9.2 targets Spring Security 3. But even for Spring Security 4 that we are using, Jasypt doesn’t have compatibility issues.

With Jasypt pulled in, we will write a bean for StrongPasswordEncryptor of Jasypt – a utility class for easily performing high-strength password encryption and checking. The configuration class, CommonBeanConfig is this.

CommonBeanConfig.java

Our generic EncryptionService interface will define two methods to encrypt and compare passwords.

EncryptionService.java

The implementation class is this.

EncryptionServiceImpl.java

In this implementation class, we autowired the StrongPasswordEncryptor bean. In Line 18, the encryptPassword() method encrypts the password passed to it. In Line 22, the checkPassword() method returns a boolean result of the password comparison.

User Details Service Implementation

Spring Security provides a UserDetailsService interface to lookup the username, password and GrantedAuthorities for any given user. This interface provides only one method, loadUserByUsername(). This method returns an implementation of Spring Security’s UserDetails interface that provides core user information.

The UserDetails implementation of our application is this.

UserDetailsImpl.java

In this class, we have defined the fields of our data model and their corresponding setter methods. The SimpleGrantedAuthority we set on Line 16 is a Spring Security implementation of an authority that we will convert from our role. Think of an authority as being a “permission” or a “right” typically expressed as strings.

We need to provide an implementation of the loadUserByUsername() method of UserDetailsService. But the challenge is that the findByUsername() method of our UserService returns a User entity, while Spring Security expects a UserDetails object from the loadUserByUsername() method.

We will create a converter for this to convert User to UserDetails implementation.

UserToUserDetails.java

This class implements the Spring Core Coverter  interface and overrides the convert() method that accepts a User object to convert. In Line 16, the code instantiates a UserDetailsImpl object, and from Line 19 – Line 26, the code initializes the UserDetailsImpl object with data from User.

With the converter ready, it’s now easy to implement the UserDetailsService interface. The implementation class is this.

Here is our implemention.

UserDetailsServiceImpl.java

In the UserDetailsServiceImpl class, we auto wired in UserService and Converter. In Line 31, the lone overridden method loadUserByUsername() converts a User to UserDetails by calling the convert() method of Converter.

Security Configuration

The current security configuration class, SpringSecConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter to configure two things. An authentication provider and the application routes to protect. Our route configuration will remain the same. However, we need to register the DAO authentication provider for use with Spring Security.

We will start by setting up a password encoder to encode passwords present in the UserDetails object returned by the configured UserDetailsService. We will define a new bean for Spring Security’s PasswordEncoder that takes in the StrongPassordEncryptor bean.

Remember that we created StrongPassordEncryptor earlier in the CommonBeanConfig Spring configuration class?

Next, we will set up the DAO authentication provider, like this.

In this code, we passed the previously configured PasswordEncoder and UserDetailsService to daoAuthenticationProvider(). The PasswordEncoder is going to use the Jasypt library for encoding the password and verifying that the passwords match. The UserDetailsService will fetch the User object from the database and hand over to Spring Security as a UserDetails object. In the method, we instantiated the DaoAuthenticationProvider and initialized it with the PasswordEncoder and UserDetailsService implementations.

Next, we need to auto wire in the AuthenticationProvider as we want the Spring Context to manage it.

We will also auto wire in the AuthenticationManagerBuilder. Spring Security will use this to set up the AuthenticationProvider.

The complete SpringSecConfig class is this.

SpringSecConfig.java

Application Bootstrapping with Seed Data

For seed data of the application, we have an ApplicationListener implementation class that gets called upon the ContextRefresedEvent on startup. In this class, we will use Spring to inject the UserRepository and RoleRepository Spring Data JPA repositories for our use. We will create two User and two Role entities and save them to the database when the application starts. The code of this class is this.

SpringJpaBootstrap.java

This class in addition to loading product data, invokes the following methods to load users and roles at startup:

  • loadUsers(): Stores two User entities. One with “user” and the other with “admin” as both the user name and password.
  • loadRoles(): Stores two Role entities for the “USER” and “ADMIN” roles.
  • assignUsersToUserRole(): Assigns the User with username “user” to the “USER” role.
  • assignUsersToAdminRole(): Assigns the User with username “admin” to the “ADMIN” role.

Free Spring TutorialThymeleaf Extras module

In the previous part 5 of this series, I discussed the Thymeleaf “extras” integration module to integrate Spring Security in our Thymeleaf templates. Things will largely remain unchanged in this presentation layer, except for two instances.
Currently, both USER and ROLE are being referred from the presentation layer code as ROLE_USER and ROLE_ADMIN. This was required because we relied on Spring Security’s in-memory authentication provider for managing our users and roles, and Spring Security’s internal feature maps a configured role to the role name prefixed with ROLE_. With the DAO authentication provider, our roles are mapped to authorities as it is (We did this in in the UserToUserDetails converter), and we can refer them directly from code as USER and ADMIN.

The second change is brought in by GrantedAuthority used by the Spring Security UserDetails interface. If you recall, we mapped our Role implementation to SimpleGrantedAuthority in the UserToUserDetails converter.

Therefore, in the Thymeleaf templates, we need to change the hasRole() and hasAnyRole() authorization expressions to hasAuthority() and hasAnyAuthorities().

The affected templates are header.html and products.html.

header.html

products.html

Running the Application

Our application is configured to run the H2 database console, which I have explained here. So, when you run the application, you’ll now be able to access the H2 database console at http://localhost:8080/console. You can use it to view the initial authentication-related data loaded by the SpringJpaBootstrap class.
USER Table for Spring Security
Role Table for Spring Security

This is how the home page appears to authenticated users with USER and ADMIN roles.

Home Page View for USER Role
Home Page View for ADMIN Role

With our Security configuration, this is how the product listing page appears to users with different roles.

Home Page View for Anonymous
Home Page View for USER Role
Home Page View for ADMIN Role

Summary

Spring Security has a large scope, and what we configured is only a small part of it. Spring Security supports XML-based and annotation-based finer level security configurations. With Spring Security, we can secure websites down to specific URLs, assign roles to URL, and even roles to different HTTP actions – a security configuration typically employed in RESTful APIs.

What makes Spring Security great is that you can easily hook in another security provider. If you noticed, we hardly made any change in the presentation and business logic layers while transitioning from the earlier basic in-memory authentication provider to the DAO provider. We could also use LDAP, Single Sign-On (SSO), OpenID, and OAuth 2.0 providers. It all depends on the requirements of your application.

Get the Source!

The full source code for this example is available here on GitHub.

0
Share
spring boot
, , ,

This is the fifth part of my tutorial series on building a Spring Boot Web Application. We started off in the first part looking at using the Spring Initializr to start our Spring Boot project. In part 2, we configured Spring MVC and ThymeLeaf templates to display a basic web page. This was followed by part 3 where we setup the H2 database and Spring Data JPA and used them to persist data of our application to the database. In part 4, we consolidated everything to provide a working Spring Boot MVC Web Application capable of performing CRUD operations. We now have an application which displays data from the database, allows you to create new records, update existing records, and delete selected records too.

In part 5, we will use Spring Security to set up authentication and authorization in our application.

Spring Security, one of the most commonly used project in the Spring family of projects, provides a powerful and highly customizable authentication and authorization framework designed specifically to secure Java applications. In this part, I’ll show you how to setup Spring Security to secure our Spring Boot Web Application using the basic in-memory authentication provider.

Security Requirements

Our Spring Boot Web application in the current state is accessible to all users. Any user can create and view products, and also edit or delete them. Before we setup Spring Security to secure our application, let’s set few security requirements:

  • An anonymous user (user who doesn’t sign in) should be able to view the home page and product listing.
  • An authenticated user, in addition to the home page and product listing, should be able to view the details of a product.
  • An authenticated admin user, in addition to the above, should be able to create, update, and delete products.

Maven Dependencies

Spring Security is already listed as a dependency of our application in the Maven POM.

In the Maven Projects pane of IntelliJ we can see the additional dependencies of  Spring Security.

spring security dependencies in Maven

As we can see the Spring Security starter has brought in Spring AOP, Spring Security web, and Spring Security config, which in turn bring in Spring Security core.

Authentication and Authorization

Before we go deep, we need to understand what authentication and authorization means in Spring Security. Although both sound similar and it’s very easy to confuse them..

Authentication means ascertaining that somebody really is who they claim to be. Authentication is performed using different mechanisms. One simple and common mechanism is through user credentials in the form of user name and password. These are stored in some type back end data store, such as a SQL database. Others include LDAP, Single Sign-On (SSO), OpenID, and OAuth 2.0.

Authorization, on the other hand, defines what you are allowed to do. For example, an authenticated user may be authorized to view products but not to add or delete them.

Remember that authentication is “Who I am?” as a user to the system. While authorization is “You are either allowed or not to do this” from the system.

Securing URLs

In part 1, where we added Spring Security into our build, Spring Boot configured Spring Security to require Basic authentication for all endpoints. In part 2, we configured Spring Security to allow all requests access to the root path. We did this by creating a SecurityConfiguration class that extends the WebSecurityConfigurerAdapater class and overridden the configure() method. We will now update the same configure() method to define which URL paths should be secured and which should not.

Here is the the updated configure() method:

This security configuration will:

  • Allows all requests to the /, /products, /product/show/*, /console/** paths (Line 5)
  • Secures all other paths of the application to require authentication (Line 6)
  • Allows everyone to view a custom /login page specified by loginPage()(Line 8)
  • Permits all to make logout calls (Line 10)
  • Disables CSRF protection (Line 12)
  • Disables X-Frame-Options in Spring Security (Line 13) for access to H2 database console. By default, Spring Security will protect against CRSF attacks.

Note: Although this is not a production-level configuration, it should get us started with the basic in-memory authentication. I’ll revisit this part, when I discuss more advanced security configuration in my upcoming posts.

In the same SecurityConfiguration class, we will also autowire a configureGlobal() overridden method of WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter. At runtime, Spring will inject an AuthenticationManagerBuilder that we will use to configure the simplest, default in-memory authentication with two users. The complete code of the
SecurityConfiguration class is this.

SecurityConfiguration.java

In this code, Line 27 – Line 30 configures in-memory authentication with two users. The first user with the username user and a password user is assigned a role of USER. The second user with the username admin and a password admin is assigned a role of ADMIN.

The Login Page

Our application will have a login page to capture user credentials in the form of user name and password. The login page, a Thymeleaf template will be served whenever a request to /login is received. We will configure the request mapping in ProductController like this.

The code of the login template is this.

login.html

This is a standard Thymeleaf template that presents a form to capture a username and password and post them to /login. Spring Security provides a filter that intercepts that request and authenticates the user with our configured in-memory authentication provider. If authentication succeeds, the application displays the requested page. If authentication fails, the request is redirected to /login?error and the login page displays the appropriate error message (Line 10 – Line 12). Upon successfully signing out, our application is sent to /login?logout and the login page displays a sign out message (Line 13 – Line 17).

This is how the login page displays an error message on authentication failure.
Spring Security Login Error Message

Spring Security Integration in Thymeleaf

To integrate Spring Security in our Thymeleaf templates, we will use the Thymeleaf “extras” integration module for Spring Security. For this, we need to add a JAR dependency in our Maven POM like this.

The Thymeleaf “extras” module is not a part of the Thymeleaf core but fully supported by the Thymeleaf team. This module follows its own schema, and therefore we need to include its XML namespace in those templates that will use security features, like this.

Showing Content based on Role

One of our application requirement states that only authenticated users with the ADMIN role can create products. To address this, we will configure authorization in the header.html Thymeleaf fragment to display the Create Product link only to users with the ADMIN role. In this template, we will also display a welcome message with the user name to an authenticated user. The code of the header.html template file is this:

header.html

The Thymeleaf security extension provides the sec:authorize attribute that renders its content when the corresponding Spring Security expression evaluates to true.

In Line 16 we used the sec:authorize attribute to display the Create Product link only if the authenticated user has the ADMIN role. Observe that we are checking against ROLE_ADMIN instead of the ADMIN role. This is because of Spring Security’s internal feature of mapping a configured role to the role name prefixed with ROLE_. In Line 23 we again used the sec:authorize attribute to check whether the user is authenticated, and if so, displayed the name using the sec:authenticate attribute.

This is how the home page appears to authenticated users with USER and ADMIN roles.

Home Page View for USER Role
Home Page View for ADMIN Role

Our current Product Listing page rendered by the products.html template displays the View, Edit, and Delete links to all users. In this template, we will configure authorization:

  • To show the View, Edit, and Delete links to a user with ADMIN role
  • To show only the View link to a user with USER role
  • Not to show any links to an anonymous user who hasn’t signed in

The code of the products.html page is this.

products.html

In Line 16 the “Sign Out” form submits a POST to /logout. Upon successfully logging out it will redirect the user to /login?logout. The remaining authorization is performed using the sec:authorize attribute. The hasAnyRole('ROLE_USER','ROLE_ADMIN') expression on Line 30 and Line 39 evaluates to true if the user has either the ROLE_USER or ROLE_ADMIN.

With this configuration, the product listing page will appear to different roles like this.

Home Page View for Anonymous
Home Page View for USER Role
Home Page View for ADMIN Role
If you are wondering why the Sign Out Submit button is getting displayed as a link, it’s due to this CSS code I added to the guru.css stylesheet.

guru.css

The code of productshow.html and productform.html templates, except for the addition of the “Sign Out” form, remains the same.

productshow.html

productform.html

Finally, if any signed in user clicks on Sign Out in any one of the secured pages, the user is redirected to the login page with a message, like this.
Spring Security Log Out Message

free spring framework tutorialSummary

Spring Security is a very popular project in the Spring Framework family of projects. When you need to secure content in a Spring Boot web application, Spring Security is a natural ‘go to’ tool to use.

In this post, I’ve only scratched the surface of the capabilities of Spring Security. For example, I used the in-memory authentication provider for Spring Security. This a great tool to demonstrate how to configure Spring Security. But, you probably would not use an in-memory authentication provider in production. It’s actually fairly common to store user credentials in a database. In the next post of this series, I’ll explain how to setup a DAO authentication provider for Spring Security.

2
Share
spring boot
, ,

In my earlier Integration Testing with Spring and JUnit post, I discussed how to test a service bean facade with JUnit. I also posted a video, titled Testing Spring with JUnit on YouTube. In post, Spring Boot Web Application – Part 3 – Spring Data JPA, I showed how to test a Spring Data JPA repository of a Spring MVC application.

It has been more than a year now since I wrote these posts and posted the video. Since then, there’s been an exciting overhaul of testing support for Spring Boot MVC applications. The Spring Boot 1.4 release includes a number of exciting new testing features for our use.

In this post, I will look the new Spring MVC testing features. And I’ll show you how to put them to use.

Spring Boot 1.4 Testing Enhancements

In Spring Boot 1.3, there’s a lot of choices to write tests for a Spring MVC application. One option to set Spring MVC is shown in my earlier post here. In this post on Spring Boot 1.3, the @RunWith annotation with @ContextConfiguration is used to test for a business service façade, like this:

Another method I used in the post here is a combination of the @RunWith annotation with @SpringApplicationConfiguration to test a Spring Data JPA repository, like this:

There are several other approaches you can check in the official Spring blog here.

The testing approaches I used above are actually integration tests.  A pure unit test shouldn’t create and load Spring Context.

Spring Boot 1.4 replaces these various testing approaches that via a single @SpringBootTest annotation for regular integration tests.

Prior to Spring Boot 1.4, I found Spring was lacking a simplified unit testing approach. This is really no surprise. The Spring team is always creating. Spring and Spring Boot offers a number of testing options. Due to innvotation, the testing options have evolved over time. In Spring Boot 1.4, the Spring committers took some time to clean testing up. They gave us much simpler options to use for testing Spring Boot applications. For example, a simple approach to unit test a controller having @Autowired external services without having to load Spring Context was lacking. With Spring Boot 1.4, it’s now possible.

Another missing piece that Spring Boot 1.4 tackels, is the ability to test portions (slices) of code. This can be done without the need to fire up a server. And with out the need to load up the entire Spring Context. Spring Boot 1.4 does this through the new Test Slicing feature that is designed to set-up a narrow slice of the Spring Context. This makes testing single ‘slices’ much easier. You can now focus on testing specific slices of your application. For example:

For example:

  • MVC slice: Controller code through the @WebMvcTest annotation
  • JPA slice: Spring Data JPA repository code through the @DataJpaTest annotation
  • JSON slice: JSON serialization code through the @JsonTest annotation

This may not seem like much at first glance. But when you have a large application starting the Spring context in testing, it is time consuming. Context loads can really increase your build time.

Let’s start putting the new test features to use.

The Application Under Test

I wrote a series of posts on Spring MVC starting off from Spring Boot Web Application – Part 1 – Spring Initializer. In the last post of the series, Spring Boot Web Application – Part 4 – Spring MVC, I completed creating a Spring MVC application to perform Create, Read, Update, and Delete (CRUD) operations.

In this post, I’ll show you how to write tests for the controllers of the same Spring MVC application.

If you are new to Spring MVC, you should go through my series on Spring MVC starting here.

You can also download the source code of the application available on GitHub here to follow along this post.

It’s a pretty simple example of a Spring Boot MVC application consisting of the following primary components:

  • Product: The domain object, which is a JPA entity
  • IndexController: Returns the index.html Thymeleaf template for a GET request to the application root
  • ProductController: Contains number of actions methods that use ProductService to perform CRUD operations via the repository model
  • ProductRepository: A Spring Data JPA repository
  • ProductService: A business service façade interface
  • ProductServiceImpl: A business service façade implementation annotated with @Service

With the Spring Boot MVC application that will be under test in place, lets start by writing few tests for the controllers.

Maven Dependencies

The testing features we’re looking at were introduced in Spring Boot 1.4. The version of Spring Boot we’ll be using is 1.4.0.RELEASE.

Here is the complete Maven POM that we’ll use.

pom.xml

Unit Testing Spring MVC Controllers

MockMvc has been around since Spring 3.2. This providing a powerful way to mock Spring MVC for testing MVC web applications. Through MockMvc, you can send mock HTTP requests to a controller and test how the controller behaves without running the controller within a server. You can obtain a MockMvc instance through the following two methods of MockMvcBuilders:

  • standaloneSetup(): Registers one or more @Controller instances and allows programmatically configuring the Spring MVC infrastructure to build a MockMvc instance. This is similar to plain unit tests while also making it possible to focus tests around a single controller at a time.
  • webAppContextSetup(): Uses the fully initialized (refreshed) WebApplicationContext to build a MockMvc instance. This lets Spring load your controllers as well as their dependencies for a full-blown integration test.

Pro Tip: Whenever possible, I will try to use standaloneSetup() for my SpringMVC tests. Your tests will remain true unit tests and stay blazing fast!

This is the IndexController that we are going to test:

IndexController.java

For our purpose, we’re starting with standaloneSetup() to test this IndexController.

The test class is this.

IndexControllerTest.java

The test class above is a JUnit test. If you are new to JUnit, you should go through my series on unit testing with JUnit, starting from here. In the test class above, observe the new Spring Boot 1.4 test runner, named SpringRunner that we specified for @RunWith in Line 20. Under the hood, both SpringRunner and its predecessor SpringJUnit4ClassRunner are the same. SpringRunner is only the new name for SpringJUnit4ClassRunner – to just make it easy on the eyes.
In the @Before annotated method that runs before all @Test method, we programmatically constructed a MockMvc instance after registering the IndexController instance.

In the @Test method, we used the MockMvc instance to verify the following behavior of IndexController:

  • HTTP status code 200 is returned
  • The name of the returned view is index

Finally, by using andDo(print()), we get the following output on the console

Spring MockMvc IndexController Test Output

Testing the Spring MVC Slice

The unit test we wrote were for some basic expectations of the controller. Let’s write some more specific tests, this time to test ProductController. This time we’re going to use webAppContextSetup() to build MockMvc.

For a quick recap, the ProductController class is this.

ProductController.java

We will start by testing the behavior of ProductController.list() method. For a GET request to /product, we will perform the following verification:

  • The ProductService mock is not null
  • The HTTP status code 200 is returned
  • The returned content type is text/html;charset=UTF-8
  • The name of the returned view is products
  • The view contains the Spring Framework Guru string

Here is the test class.

ProductControllerTest.java

As we are testing the MVC slice of the application (testing whether the ProductController is working as expected), we used the @WebMvcTest annotation combined with @RunWith(SpringRunner.class).

As we planned to use webAppContextSetup() to build MockMvc, we @autowired WebApplicationContext in Line 6 – Line 7 to bring it into our test. Then in line 13, we passed WebApplicationContext as an argument to webAppContextSetup() to build the MockMvc instance.

Going back to the ProductController class under test, note that the controller class is @Autowired with ProductService. Therefore, we used the @MockBean annotation to define a Mockito mock for ProductService (Line 8 -Line 9) that will be passed to the controller. If you are new to mocking in unit tests, checkout my Mocking in Unit Tests with Mockito post.

Coming back to the test, in Line 17 we used the AssertJ library to assert that the ProductService mock is not null.

Note: Starting with Spring Boot 1.4, AssertJ comes out-of-the-box with Spring Boot to provide a fluent assertion API with a plan to replace JUnit’s  org.junit.Assert class.

From Line 19 – Line 23, it’s all about verifying our expectations. As you can see, a lot of static methods are being used in this test method, including static methods of MockMvcRequestBuilders ( get()), MockMvcResultMatchers ( status(), content(), and view()), MockMvcResultMatchers ( match()), and Hamcrest Matcher’s ( match()). The last two match() are similar and performs the same functions in our test. They exist together only to demonstrate the different approaches that can be used.

Our test method reads naturally. First it performs a

First it performs a GET request against /products. Then it expects that the request is successful ( isOk() asserts an HTTP 200 response code) and that the content type and name of the view is text/html;charset=UTF-8 and products respectively. Finally, it asserts that the view contains the Spring Framework Guru string.

When all the expectations pass, Line 24 prints the result out to the console.

The important thing to note here is that at no time is the application gets deployed to a server. The Tomcat container is not use. Instead the application runs within a mocked out Spring MVC to handle the HTTP request that we provided through the

Instead the application runs within a mocked out Spring MVC to handle the HTTP request that we provided through the MockMvc instance.

Here is the test result in the console.
Test output of ProductController.list()

The complete output of the test sent to console is this.

Testing Spring MVC Slice with @Autowired MockMvc

Now let’s test the behavior of showProduct() of ProductController. Instead of manually building MockMvc, we’ll use a @Autowired MockMvc in the test and let Spring create, configure, and provide a MockMvc for us.

This is how the test class now looks minus any @Test method implementations.

In the test class above, notice that we used the @Autowired annotation on MockMvc in Line 5 – Line 6 instead of building it manually.

An @Autowired MockMvc combined with @WebMvcTest(controllers = ProductController.class) gives us a fully configured MockMvc instance with Spring security configured to set up BASIC authentication.

At this point, if we run the ProductControllerTest.testList() test again, we’ll encounter an authentication error, like this.

We’re getting the 401 response because Spring Boot is auto-configuring Spring Security for us.

To disable the Spring Security auto-configuration, we can the MockMvc instance to disable security with @AutoConfigureMockMvc(secure=false) in Line 3.

Note, in the @Before method, we created and initialized a Product domain object that we will use in the @Test method.

The @Test method is this: